"You raise an interesting point, but your question is muddled:

Should Anne be pardoned or aquitted for the crimes she was convicted of is how it should read.

It would be nice if she could be officially vindicated, and if you go by today's legal standard of reasonable doubt, I would say, most likely she would be aquitted of adultary. All you would have to do is look at the dates she supposedly was with the various men and start to line up the evidence to see that it is inconclusive. No jury today would convict her of that based on the evidence they had ( which was none) . But my understanding is that one of the main charges against her was speaking of the King's death in her comment to Norris that he was looking for dead man's shoes. She admitted to that, so according to the law of the land back then, she was guilty.

So I say, aquitted of adultary and pardoned for her silly comment, which I don't believe she meant in any bad way. "

"I agree. I have read that Queen Elizabeth II or Parliment(sorry if I spelled it wrong) saod that the case is too old to reopen and that there isn't any useful evidence to pardon/aquit her. And I was having a little trouble deciding what to write for this as the question, so I apologize. Thank you for making the question more specific as I should have. :)"