"I looked at her site and the only thing I saw on this topic of fact vs fiction is:

"By and large the fiction fills in the gaps of the known historical record and brings it to life."

That is just a very general statement.

She is basically a novelist who is also interested in history and gets inspiration from it and then runs with it in her own way. There is obviously a market for it out there, namely low to mid brow devourers of atmospheric novels. At the risk of sounding snobbish, I have to say I don't really care what these people think. Let them eat Tudor cake!!

For just about everything in our consumer culture, there will always be a "pop" version and a more serious, true and meaningful version, whether it be in art, music, history, television, fiction or whatever.
"

"But then her war of the roses books weren't as outlandish as the other boyeln girl was though, and realitvely historicaly correct. (And the last one though it is Elizabeth's Woodville's mother had almost non of the magic nonsense that was on every page of the White Queen)."

"You know with all this Gregory hate I find it funny that she has realitively recently published a nonfiction book (or something not sure if it was just a paper instead of a full book) with a few other writers on the war of the roses. But then her war of the roses books weren't as outlandish as the other boyeln girl was though, and realitvely historicaly correct. (And the last one though it is Elizabeth's Woodville's mother had almost non of the magic nonsense that was on every page of the White Queen)."