He's one of those guys whose looks grow on a person. You don't really look at him and think of him as stunning or gorgeous or anything, and that's okay. To be honest, I could always imagine the guy who played Culpepper in the role of Tom Seymour. It's not that he's ugly, but that there are so many good-looking guys in the show. It's an eye candy overload. I agree with nightstarrocker, though. Tom Seymour DOES look better in Season 4 than he did in Season 3. But if you'll recall, the same thing happened with Edward Seymour. When Ed first appeared in Season 2, he was just okay, and actually quite forgettable. Plus, his haircut did nothing for him. Fast-forward to Season 3 and he was right up there with Charles Brandon in terms of looks.

As for George Boleyn, he was never attractive to me. However, his character was very likeable to me, up until his mistreatment of his wife. =/

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?    

"I heard that season four might be the last for The Tudors which is sad because Tom Seymour doesn't really become significant until Edward's reign. Do you think that they'll show his relationship with Katherine Parr or foreshadow his lecher ways with Elizabeth? That experince played a big role for
the rest for Elizabeth's life.

Or will we see him go the way of Margaret/Mary Tudor; never ever ever to be mentioned beyond again upon pain of replacing you next season with a taller, older blonde?"

That's what I'm wondering too. I hope that Hirst's introduction of him this season won't lead to nothing. He was vile, but he's the perfect "character" to help the show keep its edge. I hope that they don't drag the entire Katherine Howard saga out at the expense of Katherine Parr's storyline. Her romance with Tom Seymour, her relationship with Henry's children, and her part in the continuing Reformation are just as interesting as KH and Culpepper's affair.

 out of  found this valuable. Do you find this valuable?